Office or home versus 24-hour blood pressure measurement in stable kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to quantify hypertension control and evaluate concordance between all commonly available blood pressure modalities in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). METHODS: For this prospective cross-sectional study 89 stable KTR were recruited at the Charité Transplant Outpatient Clinic. For each study participant office (manual office blood pressure 'MOBP' and automated office blood pressure 'AOBP'), 7-day home (HBPM) and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement (24h-ABPM) were performed. RESULTS: 80 of the 89 patients recruited had sufficient blood pressure recordings. Mean blood pressure for MOBP, AOBP, HBPM and 24h-ABPM was 129/73, 126/71, 131/85 and 130/81 mmHg, respectively. Uncontrolled hypertension, as defined by 24h-ABPM (mean ≥ 130/80 mmHg), was present in 53 (66%) patients. MOBP, AOBP and HBPM classified 19 (24%), 22 (28%) and 41 (51%) patients respectively as 'uncontrolled hypertensive'. The Bland-Altman plot showed good agreement between systolic MOBP, AOBP, HBPM and Daytime-ABPM (mean bias ± SD: -1 ± 13 mmHg, -4 ± 13 mmHg, 1 ± 10 mmHg, respectively). Uncontrolled nighttime hypertension was present in 74 (93%) KTR, with 71 (89%) patients showing a non-physiological dipping pattern. Moderate positive correlation between Daytime-ABPM/HBPM and Nighttime-ABPM (Pearson Correlation Coefficients: 0.62-0.73), followed by MOBP/AOBP (Pearson Correlation Coefficients: 0.49-0.59) was noted. eGFR and proteinuria displayed weak correlation with 24h-, Daytime- and Nighttime-ABPM (absolute values of Pearson Correlation Coefficients: 0.04-0.41). No robust association with either 24h-, Daytime- or Nighttime-ABPM was observed for volume status exams. CONCLUSIONS: Masked hypertension is highly prevalent in KTR, especially due to high rates of uncontrolled nighttime hypertension. HBPM shows the narrowest limits of agreement with Daytime-ABPM. Daytime-ABPM and HBPM show the highest, albeit clinically insufficient, correlation with Nighttime-ABPM. Systematic integration of 24h-ABPM into clinical practice, as proposed by the '2023 ESH Guidelines for the Management of arterial hypertension', should not be withheld for the KTR population. Clinical trials evaluating treatment of hypertension in KTR are urgently needed.

COVID-19 Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients in a German Transplant Center.

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) show higher morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 than the general population and have an impaired response to vaccination. We analyzed COVID-19 incidence and clinical outcomes in a single-center cohort of approximately 2500 KTRs. Between 1 February 2020 and 1 July 2022, 578 KTRs were infected with SARS-CoV-2, with 25 (4%) recurrent infections. In total, 208 KTRs (36%) were hospitalized, and 39 (7%) died. Among vaccinated patients, infection with the Omicron variant had a mortality of 2%. Unvaccinated patients infected with the Omicron variant showed mortality (9% vs. 11%) and morbidity (hospitalization 52% vs. 54%, ICU admission 12% vs. 18%) comparable to the pre-Omicron era. Multivariable analysis revealed that being unvaccinated (OR = 2.15, 95% CI [1.38, 3.35]), infection in the pre-Omicron era (OR = 3.06, 95% CI [1.92, 4.87]), and higher patient age (OR = 1.04, 95% CI [1.03, 1.06]) are independent risk factors for COVID-19 hospitalization, whereas a steroid-free immunosuppressive regimen was found to reduce the risk of COVID-19 hospitalization (OR = 0.51, 95% CI [0.33, 0.79]). This suggests that both virological changes in the Omicron variant and vaccination reduce the risk for morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 in KTRs. Our data extend the knowledge from the general population to KTRs and provide important insights into outcomes during the Omicron era.

Letermovir Rescue Therapy in Kidney Transplant Recipients with Refractory/Resistant CMV Disease.

(1) Background: CMV infections remain a problem after kidney transplantation, particularly if patients are refractory or resistant (r/r) to treatment with valganciclovir (VGCV) or ganciclovir (GCV). (2) Methods: In a single-center retrospective study, kidney transplant recipients (KTR) receiving letermovir (LTV) as rescue therapy for VGCV-/GCV-r/r CMV disease were analyzed regarding CMV history, immunosuppression, and outcomes. (3) Results: Of 201 KTR treated for CMV between 2017 and 2022, 8 patients received LTV following treatment failure with VGCV/GCV. All patients received CMV prophylaxis with VGCV according to the center's protocol, and 7/8 patients had a high-risk (D+/R-) CMV constellation. In seven of eight cases, rising CMV levels occurred during prophylaxis. In seven of eight patients, a mutation in UL97 associated with a decreased response to VGCV/GCV was detected. In four of eight patients, LTV resulted in CMV clearance after 24 ± 10 weeks (16-39 weeks), two of eight patients stabilized at viral loads <2000 cop/mL (6-20 weeks), and two of eight patients developed LTV resistance (range 8-10 weeks). (4) Conclusion: LTV, which is currently evaluated for CMV prophylaxis in kidney transplantation, also shows promising results for the treatment of patients with VGCV/GCV resistance despite the risk of developing LTV resistance. Additional studies are needed to further define its role in the treatment of patients with CMV resistance.

Cancer Associated Fibroblasts Derived from Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and Their Role in Cell Migration.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) shows poor survival and early systemic dissemination. Cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) enhance migration and invasion of cancer cells. We aimed to investigate the role of CAFs in cell migration and their underlying paracrine effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using Transwell® migration assays, PDAC cells (PANC-1) and three distinct types of fibroblasts were analyzed: CAFs, genetically transformed human foreskin-fibroblasts (BJeLR), and non-transformed human foreskin-fibroblasts (VH7). IL6 in the culture supernatant was measured to investigate paracrine communication in monocultures and direct/indirect cocultures. RESULTS: CAFs showed a significantly higher capacity to migrate in vitro when compared to benign fibroblasts (p=0.009). They also facilitated the migration of PDAC cells in coculture (p=0.001). Neither BJeLR, nor VH7 displayed such features. This was accompanied by a significant increase in IL-6 when CAFs were cocultured with PANC-1 (p=0.009). CONCLUSION: CAFs are a key element of intra-tumoral migration and should be further investigated as a potential therapeutic target.

Notch Signaling Pathway in Pancreatobiliary Tumors.

Background and objectives: The Notch signaling pathway plays an important role both in the development of the ductal systems of the pancreas and the bile ducts as well as in cancer development and progression. The aim of this study was to examine the expression of central proteins of the Notch signaling pathway in pancreatobiliary tumors and its influence on patient survival. Materials and Methods: We compared the receptors (Notch1, Notch4), activating splicing factors (ADAM17), and target genes (HES1) of the Notch pathway and progenitor cell markers with relevance for the Notch signaling pathway (CD44, MSI1) between pancreatic adenocarcinomas (PDAC, n = 14), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC, n = 24), and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCC, n = 22) cholangiocarcinomas via immunohistochemistry and ImageJ software-assisted analysis. An Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-score was determined by the percentage and intensity of stained (positive) cells (scale 0-7) and normal and malignant tissue was compared. In the IHC results, patients' (gender, age) and tumor (TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, Union Internationale contre le Cancer (UICC) stages, grading, and lymphangitic carcinomatosa) characteristics were correlated to patient survival. Results: For eCC, the expression of CD44 (p = 0.043, IHC-score 3.94 vs. 3.54) and for iCC, the expression of CD44 (p = 0.026, IHC-score 4.04 vs. 3.48) and Notch1 (p < 0.001, IHC-score 2.87 vs. 1.78) was significantly higher in the tumor compared to non-malignant tissue. For PDAC, the expression of ADAM17 (p = 0.008, IHC-score 3.43 vs. 1.73), CD44 (p = 0.012, IHC-score 3.64 vs. 2.27), Notch1 (p = 0.012, IHC-score 2.21 vs. 0.64), and Notch4 (p = 0.008, IHC-score 2.86 vs. 0.91) was significantly higher in the tumor tissue. However, none of the analyzed Notch-signaling related components showed an association to patient survival. Conclusion: A significant overexpression of almost all studied components of the Notch signaling pathway can be found in the tumor tissue, however, without a significant influence on patient survival. Therefore, further studies are warranted to draw conclusions on Notch pathway's relevance for patient survival.